SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(UK) 468

RAJESH TANDON
ASHISH NANDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
SIDDHARTHA SHAH

( 1 ) BY the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a writ of certiorari quashing the orders dated 30-3-2001 and 27-3-1998 as well as the orders dated 29-3-2000 and 26-11-1997.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated, the petitioner has purchased land of khata by virtue of sale deed dated 5-4-1994 land of Khata No. 49-Ka area 2 Nali 4 Mutthis by virtue of sale deed dated 5-4-1994. The sale deed in question was valued at Rs. 67,215/- and the stamp duty according to the petitioner was paid to the extent of Rs. 9800/ -. However, a notice was issued under Section 47-A of the Indian stamp Act stating therein that the petitioner having purchased 2 Nali 4 mutthis land which is situated about 200 meters away from the motorable road and he is required to pay the deficiency to the extent of Rs. 28,697. 50p. The petitioner has objected to the said notice on the ground that he has paid the stamp duty on the basis of the circle rate determined by the Collector and, therefore, the notice is liable to be dropped.

( 3 ) ON the basis of the objections filed by the petitioner a report was called from the patwari which shows that there is no residential house as there was no roof at the relevant time when






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top