SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(UK) 267

P.C.VERMA, B.C.KANDPAL
STATE OF U. P. – Appellant
Versus
R. B. NARAIN SINGH SUGAR MILLS LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Alok Singh, K.P.Upadhyaya, Mamta Joshi, SHARAD SHARMA

( 1 ) THE disputed property involved in both the above appeals belongs to the same and the one Sugar Factory at one site and similar controversies are involved in these cases, hence both the appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

( 2 ) F. A. No. 15/2002, arise out of the judgment and decree dated 13-12-2001, passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Haridwar in O. S. No. 4 of 1992, R. B. Narain Singh v. State of U. P. and others, whereby the suit of the plaintiff/respondent was decreed for permanent injunction prohibiting the defendants/appellants not to interfere and evict the plaintiff from the peaceful possession of the suit property.

( 3 ) F. A. No. 9/2003 has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 4-1-2003, passed by District Judge, Haridwar, in O. S. No. 03/1992, whereby the suit of the plaintiff/respondents for permanent prohibitory injunction was decreed against the defendant/appellants.

( 4 ) THE relevant facts, in brief, are that the plaintiff/respondent R. B. Narain Singh sugar Mills Ltd. is a Company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913 now 1956, which was established in the year 1932-33 at Baraut, Distr










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top