SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(UK) 184

PRAFULLA C.PANT
VIVEK SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Applicant :Mr. D.S. Patni, Advocate
For the Respondents: Learned A.G.A.

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Sri D.S. patni, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. By means of this fresh petition, petitioner has sought quashing of proceedings arisen out of charge sheet dated 30.8.1992 (annexure 5) registeed as Criminal Case no. 1552 of 1992 in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nainital, State Vs. Vivek Singh.

3. Brief facts of the case are that in respect of some incident dated 12.6.1991, complainant lodged some First Information Report against present petitioner and another accused Rajeev Chaudhary, which was registered as Case Crime No. 179 of 1991, relating to offences punishable Section 307/34 of I.P.C. with Police Sation Mallital Nainital. It appears that after investigation a charge sheet was filed against petitioner Vivek Singh and co-accused Rajeev Chaudhary for their trial in respect of the offence allegedly committed by them punishable under Section 307 read with 34 of I.P.C. The Magistrate took cognizance on said charge sheet. However, meanwhile, it appears that a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. (no. 3233 of 1998) was filed before Allahabad High Court by present petitioner Vivek Singh, seeking quashing of the aforesa





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top