SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(UK) 16

DHARAM VEER
AKIL AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Mr.I.S. Mehra, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder

JUDGMENT

This appeal, preferred by the appellant u/s 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.05.1988 passed by I Addl. Sessions Judge, Nainital in Sessions Trial No. 79 of 1987, whereby the learned I Addl. Sessions Judge has convicted the appellant under Section 328 of Indian Penal /Code, 1860 (hereinafter to be referred as I.P.C.), and sentenced him for three years R.I. and fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine, six months further rigorous imprisonment was awarded. It was also directed that out of the fine, if realized from the appellant/accused, a sum of Rs. 500/- would be paid to the victim Aftab Alam as compensation. By the same judgment and order, the learned I Addl. Sessions Judge has acquitted the accused Smt. Shabri Begum and Km. Sama Begum.

2. In brief, the prosecution case is that P.W. 2 Mehboob Alam lodged a report stating therein that his son P.W. 3 Aftab Alam had illicit relations with Mumtaz daughter of appellant Akil Ahmad. Once they both were seen together by appellant Akil Ahmad and Smt. Shabri Begum, they threatened Aftab Alam to kill him. On 18.11.1985






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top