DHARAM VEER
RAVI CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent
This criminal revision, preferred by the revisionist under Sections 397/401 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 03.06.2006 passed by Sessions Judge, Hardwar in Criminal Revision No.281 of 2005, Pradeep Paliwal and others Vs. State of Uttaranchal, whereby the revision preferred by respondent Nos.2 to 5 has been allowed and judgment and order dated 1.9.2005 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Hardwar has been set aside.
2. Heard Sri S.K. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv: assisted by Sri Tapan Singh, Adv. For the revisionist, Sri M.A. Khan, learned Brief Holder for the State/Respondent No.1, Sri U.K. Uniyal, Sr. Adv. assisted by Sri Sandeep Kothari, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 and perused the entire material available on record.
3. In brief, the facts of the case are that revisionist-Ravi Chaudhary had filed a case of injunction against the respondents-Sanjay Paliwal and others in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Divison) Hardwar regarding Plot No. 15 situated in New Hardwar in which the Civil Judge (S.D.) had passed injunction order in favour of the revisionist and against the respondents. On 5.7.2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.