SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(UK) 260

J.C.S.RAWAT
SRI MAKSOOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Mr. Abdul Wahid, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A.

JUDGMENT

This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 09.07.2007 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge/1st F.T.C., Nainital in Special Sessions Trial No. 26 of 2006, State Vs. Maksood, u/s 18/20 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred as Act, 1985) whereby the accused/appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and a fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- u/s 20 of the Act, 1985. In default of payment of fine, the accused/appellant would further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 2½ years.

2. Brief facts leading to the prosecution case are that on 26.01.2006 at about 10:00 a.m. S.I. N.R. Vishawakarma alongwith the police patrolling party was in law and order patrolling duty at Bheemtal. When they reached near Mount Alvern School, they saw a person coming from Mallital. The person was holding bag in his back. Seeing the police patrolling party coming over there, he started moving fast from there. On suspicion, the police patrolling party immediately apprehended him. After being apprehended, the accused/appellant disclosed his identity as Maksood S/o Makbool and admitted that he was having charas in the bag which he




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top