SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(UK) 406

PRAFULLA C.PANT
JAGMOHAN SINGH BISHT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Mr. Rajendra Kotiyal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. M.A. Khan, Brief Holder

JUDGMENT

This appeal, preferred under section 374 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.) is directed against judgment and order dated 03.12.2008, passed by Additional Sessions Judge/I Fast Track Court, Nainital, in Sessions Trial No. 57 of 2007, State vs. Jagmohan Singh Bisht, whereby said court has convicted the appellant Jagmohan Singh Bisht under section 304-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) and one punishable under section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, and sentenced the convict to rigorous imprisonment for a period of 7 years (under section 304B IPC), and rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year and directed to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/- under section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the lower court record.

3. Prosecution story in brief is that on 29.11.2002, appellant Jagmohan Singh Bisht got married to Prabha @ Pratibha (deceased), daughter of complainant Ram Singh Adhikari (P.W.1). The deceased used to live in her husband’s house in Haldwani after her marriage. A son was born out of the wed-lock. In the first information report (Ex. A1) complainant Ram Singh Adhikari (P.W.1) has alleged th
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top