PRAFULLA C.PANT
HALDIRAM SNACKS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the orders dated 07.07.2006 and 02.11.2007, passed by respondent No. 3 (copies annexure-12 and 19 to the writ petition). By the impugned order dated 07.07.2006, allotment of industrial plot in favour of the petitioner is cancelled, and by the impugned order dated 02.11.2007, representation of the petitioner is rejected.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the affidavit, counter affidavit, rejoinder affidavit, supplementary affidavits, supplementary counter affidavits and supplementary rejoinder affidavits, on record.
3. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner is a private Ltd. company, registered under Companies Act, 1956, State Industrial Development Corporation of Uttarakhand Ltd. (for short SIDCUL), is a company owned by the State Government. To attract industrial entrepreneurs in the State of Uttarakhand, SIDCUL invited applications for establishing industrial units in the State. In response to said invitation, petitioner also submitted its application and deposited necessary fee. Vide letter dated 15
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.