PRAFULLA C.PANT
DEVI LAL SAH (SINCE DECEASED) – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE (E)/RENT CONTROL AND EVICTION OFFICER, NAINITAL – Respondent
By means of this petition, the petitioners have sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 18.12.1999 (copy Annexure-6 to the writ petition), passed by respondent No. 1 i.e. Additional District Magistrate (E)/Rent Control and Eviction Officer (for short RCEO), rejecting the release application of the landlord, and order dated 25.01.2000 (copy Annexure-8 to the writ petition), passed by said authority, whereby building known as Standard Hotel has been allotted to Bhupal Singh Bhakuni (respondent No. 2). A mandamus has also been sought directing the respondents to handover immediate possession of House No. 166-67, Upper Floor, Standard Hotel, Mallital, Nainital.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the affidavit, counter affidavit and rejoinder affidavit filed on the record.
Facts of the Case :
3. Brief facts of the case are that petitioners are landlords of building known as Standard Hotel, bearing Municipal Board No. 166-67 (Upper Storey), Mallital, Nainital. Previously, respondent No. 3 Joseph Menzes and his sister were tenants in said accommodation, after death of their mother (original tenant). Proceedings were initiated by Competen
1. Parbhash Chandra Jain vs. A.D.J. 2005 (1) A.W.C. 781.
3. State of H.P. & ors vs. Gujarat Ambuja Cement Limited & anr (2005) 6 S.C.C. 499.
4. Kanak and another vs. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad and others (2003) 7 S.C.C. 693).
2. Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union vs. Birla Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. & Anr (2005) 13 SCC 777.
5. A.V. Papayya Sastry & ors vs. Govt. of A.P. & ors (2007) 4 S.C.C. 221.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.