SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(UK) 383

B.S.VERMA
SHRUTI FRUITS PVT. LTD. KASHIPUR – Appellant
Versus
SUREIYA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Sharad Sharma, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Jagdish Bisht, Advocate

Judgment

By means of this petition, the petitioners have sought writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 6th July, 2009, whereby the application filed by the plaintiff (respondent herein) for Survey Commission was allowed. It has further been prayed by the petitioners that during the pendency of writ petition, further proceedings of Suit No. 59 of 2009 be stayed.

2. Brief facts of the case, giving rise to the writ petition, are that suit for permanent injunction was instituted by the respondent (petitioners herein) restraining the defendants to interfere in plot No. 359 situated at Village-Bailjuri, Tehsil-Kashipur. According to the plaintiff/respondent, during the pendency of the suit she allegedly raised a wall in her plot and according to the petitioners/defendants, the wall was already in existence in their plot No. 358. It is also contended that the wall was also demolished by the plaintiff. The plaint was amended and relief ‘B’ was sought for mandatory injunction to demolish the wall allegedly constructed by the petitioners/defendants during the pendency of the suit.

3. An application for issuance of the commission (paper No. 21-C) was moved before t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top