SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(UK) 263

PRAFULLA C.PANT
Kichha Sugar Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Tara Chand Mahtoliya – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P.C. Pant, J.

1. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the impugned order/award dated 24.9.1992 passed in Adjudication Case No. 97 of 1990 by the Labour Court, Haldwani.

2. Brief facts of the case, as narrated in the writ petition, are that the petitioner is a Sugar Company owned and controlled by the U. P. State Sugar Corporation, Lucknow. It employed permanent as well as seasonal employees for running the business of sugar factory. Out of the seasonal workmen, some are engaged on daily wages and others as casual workmen to meet the emergent situation. The respondent No. 1, Tara Dutt Mahtoliya was employed on daily wages during the season 1982-83 till 1985-86. While he was working as a Watchman in the intervening night of 25/26 of October 1987, a theft took place in the residential colony whereafter the services of the respondent No. 1 were terminated on 27.10.1987. The termination was made due to the negligence in duty on the part of respondent No. 1. It appears that respondent No. 1 raised the industrial dispute before the Labour Court, Haldwani (respondent No. 2) who gave its award dated












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top