PRAFULLA C.PANT
Kichha Sugar Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Tara Chand Mahtoliya – Respondent
P.C. Pant, J.
1. By means of this writ petition, moved under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought quashing of the impugned order/award dated 24.9.1992 passed in Adjudication Case No. 97 of 1990 by the Labour Court, Haldwani.
2. Brief facts of the case, as narrated in the writ petition, are that the petitioner is a Sugar Company owned and controlled by the U. P. State Sugar Corporation, Lucknow. It employed permanent as well as seasonal employees for running the business of sugar factory. Out of the seasonal workmen, some are engaged on daily wages and others as casual workmen to meet the emergent situation. The respondent No. 1, Tara Dutt Mahtoliya was employed on daily wages during the season 1982-83 till 1985-86. While he was working as a Watchman in the intervening night of 25/26 of October 1987, a theft took place in the residential colony whereafter the services of the respondent No. 1 were terminated on 27.10.1987. The termination was made due to the negligence in duty on the part of respondent No. 1. It appears that respondent No. 1 raised the industrial dispute before the Labour Court, Haldwani (respondent No. 2) who gave its award dated
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.