2005 (1) U.D. 195
HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL
P. C. Verma,B. C. Kandpal, JJ
Johar Singh And Anr.
vs
State
Criminal Appeal No.575 of 2001
Decided on : 25/11/2004
Criminal Appeal - Murder - Sections 302/34, 307/34, 379, I.P.C. - Summary of Acts and Sections: Sections 302/34, 307/34, 379, I.P.C. - The court discussed the promptness of the First Information Report, the motive of the accused, the presence of eyewitnesses, and the medical evidence to establish the guilt of the accused. The court also addressed the arguments raised by the appellant's counsel and found no merit in them.
Fact of the Case:
The prosecution case involved the murder of Dhan Singh and the assault on other individuals at a tea stall. The accused were convicted under Sections 302/34, 307/34, 379, I.P.C.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the First Information Report to be prompt and trustworthy, established the motive of the accused, and relied on the presence of eyewitnesses and medical evidence to confirm the guilt of the accused.
Issues: Promptness of the First Information Report, motive of the accused, presence of eyewitnesses, and medical evidence.
Ratio Decidendi: The promptness of the First Information Report, the motive of the accused, the presence of eyewitnesses, and the medical evidence were crucial in establishing the guilt of the accused.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court were confirmed.
B.C. Kandpal, J.
1. This criminal appeal arises against the judgment and order dated 1-9-1987 passed by Sessions Judge, Almora in S.T. No. 33 of 1986, State v. Johar Singh and another convicting the accused/appellants under Sections 302/34, 307/34 and 379, I.P.C. and sentencing them to life imprisonment under Section 302/34, 7 (Seven) years' rigorous imprisonment under Section 307/34, I.P.C. and further 1 year rigorous imprisonment under Section 379 I.P.C.
2. Brief facts of the prosecution case are that one Dhan Singh father of the complainant Ratan Singh R/o village Udalgaon was going to Bageshwar on 8-4-1985 with Guman Singh and complainant was also accompanying them. At about 8.00 a.m. when they reached near Riyunikhet, they started waiting for the bus at the tea stall of Bahadur Singh and started taking tea. Alter some time, Gusain Singh, Dan Singh and Balram Singh also reached over there. At about 8.30 A.M. a car came from the side of the Bageshwar, which was being driven by an unknown person. The car stopped in front of tea stall and it could reveal that the accused/appellant Johar Singh and his companion Sunder Singh were sitting at the back seat of the car. The accused/appellant Johar Singh is the cousin of complainant Ratan Singh, as grandfather of both the persons were real brothers. A barrelled weapon carne out from the window of the car and firing started. The first shot hit Balram and the second shot was fired at Guman Singh. All the persons sitting at the tea stall started running in order to save their life. The complainant also ran towards Bageshwar. Guman Singh crawled towards Gomti river which lies towards the south of the tea stall. When the complainant had run for about 30-40 yards, he saw that the accused and his associates were chasing his father having fire-arms with them. He also saw that Guman Singh was also being chased by these persons, but Guman Singh succeeded in crossing the Gomti River and hid himself behind the big boulder. Thereafter, the accused stopped chasing Guman Singh and returned. While returning, they saw Dhan Singh father of the complainant who was hiding himself in a wheat crop field. The accused/appellants Johar Singh and his companion -- Sunder Singh started firing at Dhan Singh and after coming near to Dhan Singh, Johar Singh fired another shot from a distance of about 2-3 ft. and thereafter both these assailants after assaulting Dhan Singh with the fire-arm, came to the tea stall and took away the gun of Guman Singh which was left at the tea stall. Both the assailants entered the car and went towards Bejnath.
3. After this occurrence was over, the complainant Ratan Singh carne to the place where his father was lying dead. The body had fire-arm injuries and blood was oozing out. Ratan Singh accompanied by Balram to Bageshwar and lodged the First Information Report at P.S. Bageshwar at about 10.30 a.m.
4. After the registration of the case, the investigation was entrusted to S.O. Bhagwan Din Verma who immediately reached the scene of the occurrence where the inquest on the dead body of Dhan Singh was performed. After the inquest was over, the body was sent for post-mortem examination. The Investigation Officer performed other formalities like collecting the plain and bloodstained earth and preparing the site plan of the place of occurrence. The Investigation Officer also recorded the statement of the complainant Ratan Singh. The Investigation Officer also reached at the place of occurrence on 9-4-1985 and found some pellets in the pieces of wood, which was taken into custody and the memo was prepared.
5. The post-mortem examination of the dead body was conducted on 8-4-1985 at 3.30 P.M. by Dr. R.C.S. Sayana, who found following ante mortem injuries on the person of the deceased :--
"1. Gun shot wound, 8 cm x 6 cm x chest cavity deep on the right side of posterior axillary fold with upper posterior part of right arm, (wound of entry). Margins are inverted. Underneath the right ribs
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.