SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(UK) 241

2005 (2) U.D. 192
HIGH COURT OF UTTARANCHAL
P. C. Verma,B.S. Verma, JJ
Singh And Company
vs
Collector
First Appeal No.175 of 2001
Decided on : 8/7/2005

The determination of compensation for acquired land should be based on evidence of comparable sales, and the circle rate is only a guideline and not final for determining market value.

Headnote:

Land Acquisition - Kumaon University - Land Acquisition Act - Section 4(1), Section 6 - Summary: The court addressed the determination of compensation for land acquired for the construction of offices and residences of Kumaon University, Nainital. The claimant sought enhanced compensation, challenging the valuation and deductions made by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. The court considered the market value of the acquired land, the adequacy of compensation for trees and buildings, and the applicability of circle rates fixed by the Collector. The court held that the circle rate is only a guideline and not final for determining market value, and compensation should be based on evidence of comparable sales. The claimant was awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 12 per sq. ft. for the acquired land, and the award was partly allowed. The appeal by the Collector was dismissed.

Fact of the Case:

The State Government acquired 4.56 acres of land for Kumaon University, Nainital. The claimant challenged the valuation and deductions made by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, seeking enhanced compensation for the acquired land, trees, and buildings. The claimant provided evidence of sale deeds and argued for a higher compensation rate.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the circle rate fixed by the Collector is only a guideline and not final for determining market value. The court determined compensation based on evidence of comparable sales, awarding compensation at the rate of Rs. 12 per sq. ft. for the acquired land. The court upheld the compensation for trees and buildings as awarded by the Special Land Acquisition Officer.

Issues: The issues included the fairness of compensation for the acquired land, trees, and buildings, and the legality of deductions made by the Land Acquisition Officer.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the circle rate is only a guideline and not final for determining market value, and compensation should be based on evidence of comparable sales. The court also emphasized the admissibility of certified copies of sale transactions under Section 51A of the Land Acquisition Act.

Final Decision: The claimant was awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 12 per sq. ft. for the acquired land, and the award was partly allowed. The appeal by the Collector was dismissed.

JUDGMENT

P.C. Verma, J.

1. Both these appeals arise of the same judgment and order passed by the Reference Court and similar questions are involved for determination in these appeals, therefore, they are being decided by this common judgment.

2. First Appeal No. 175 of 2001 has been preferred by the claimant/appellant against the judgment and award dated 30-5-1989 passed by the III Additional District Judge, Nainital in Land Acquisition Case No. 104 of 1983, Singh and Company v. Collector, Nainital, whereby the reference made by the Collector, Nainital under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act was allowed partly and the claimant was held entitled for compensation of Rs. 15,89,072.00 for the acquired land and Rs. 2,01,600.00 for the trees and buildings and on these amounts solatium at the rate of 30% along with interest @ 12% per annum on the increased amount of compensation from the date of possession of the acquired property till the date of payment, whereas First Appeal No. 673 of 2001 has been preferred by the Collector, Nainital (respondent in First Appeal No. 175 of 2001) against the aforesaid judgment and award dated 30-5-1989 passed in L.A. Case No. 104 of 1983 for setting aside the order passed by the III Additional District Judge, Nainital and further to confirm the award given by the Land Acquisition Officer, Nainital in the said case. On the other hand, the State/Collector, Nainital has also come up in First Appeal No. 673 of 2001.

3. Brief facts of the case, giving rise to these appeals, are that the State Government had acquired 4-56 acres of land for the construction of offices and residences of Kumaon University, Nainital. The acquiring body was the Kumaon University, Nainital. Notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was made on 31-5-1980 and notification under Section 6 of the Act was made on 7-3-1981. The acquired landed property belongs to the claimant M/s. Singh & Company within the Municipal limits of Nainital. The Special Land Acquisition Officer calculated the price at the rate of Rs. 8.00 per sq. feet and certain deductions have also been made. A deduction of 25% has been made because the acquired land measures a vast area; another deduction of 25% has been made because the land was uneven and great expenditure will be needed to make the land plain. In this manner the compensation payable for the land had been worked out by the Special Land Acquisition Officer at the rate of Rs. 4.50 per sq. feet, which comes to Rs. 8,93,855.00. The trees in the land have been valued at Rs. 69,000.00. The buildings situated in the land have been valued at Rs. 1,32,000.00. Solatium at the rate of 15% has been granted on the compensation payable in respect of land, trees and buildings. A total sum of Rs. 12,59,770.95 has been awarded to the claimants by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, vide his judgment and award dated 28-2-1983.

4. Aggrieved by the said award dated 28-2-1983, the claimant M/s. Singh & Company through its owners made reference through the Collector to the District Judge, Nainital under Section 18 of the Act on 8-4-1983 for decision and determination on the grounds, inter alia, that the land acquired is situate in the heart of the Nainital town and very close to the main market and other important places of Nainital town, such as, O.T.S. Nainital Club, Polytechnic etc. and possesses greater value. The exemplar sale deed relied by the Special Land Acquisition Officer is not so close to the main market and is very far from it. That the land acquired has wrongly been classified and grossly under-valued and the valuation given in the award is quite unreasonable and beyond the actual facts. That from all the sides the land is approachable by motor road. The whole locality is a posh locality. The present rates of this area is in between Rs. 15/- to 20/- per sq. feet but the applicant claimed the value of the land at the rate of Rs. 15/- per sq. feet. Onl








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top