SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(UK) 275

TARUN AGARWALA
Karunesh Joshi S/o Tara Dutt Joshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Judgment

Since both the writ petitions raise a common issue, the same is being decided together.

2. The petitioner Karunesh Joshi has filed the Writ Petition No.945 of 2007 (S/S) for the quashing of the order dated 18th May, 2006 passed by the District Magistrate, Nainital as well as the order dated 13th June, 2006 passed by the Secretary, Department of Personnel, Government of Uttarakhand and further sought a relief in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to give an appointment to the petitioner pursuant to the Government Order dated 11th August, 2004.

3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the writ petition is, that the petitioner contend that he is a permanent resident of Uttarakhand and was an active participant in the agitation for the creation of the State of Uttaranchal (now ‘Uttarakhand’). It is alleged that during the agitation for the creation of the State of Uttarakhand, several residents of this area were injured in the movement and also went to jail. Some of them were seriously injured and were hospitalized and others went to jail. Upon the creation of the State of Uttarakhand on 09th November, 2000, the Chief Minister made a public statement in his






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top