V.K.GUPTA
Smt. Zeenat & otherss – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal – Respondent
Mr. R.K.S. Verma, Advocate for the applicants.
Mr. Nandan Arya, Asstt. Government Advocate for the State.
Mr. Lalit Miglani, Advocate for respondent no. 2.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. As per the FIR in question, the marriage took place on 30th April, 2003 and the daughter of the complainant - respondent no. 2 Shabeena went to live in the matrimonial house in Ghaziabad. The FIR alleges that because of cruelty etc. relating to dowry harassment etc. Shabeena had to come back to Hardwar. At Hardwar, complaint was filed with the Women Helpline for dowry harassment etc. and the date was fixed before the Women Helpline on 5-8-2008. The FIR further alleges that at Hardwar- the complainant - respondent no. 2 started receiving threatening calls from the petitioner no. 4 Asad Husnain, the husband of Shabeena and the father of the petitioner no. 4, Aizaz Husnain (who has since died). I have carefully perused the FIR in question, as far as the jurisdiction of Hardwar is concerned, the only allegation is about the complainant receiving threatening calls from Asad Husnain - petitioner no. 4 and his late father. There is no mention at all about the complainant receiving t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.