SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(UK) 123

PRAFULLA C.PANT, DHARAM VEER
Sher Ali – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sri Rajendra Kotyal and Sri Sandeep Kothari, Advocates for the petitioner. Sri G.S.
Sandhu, Government Advocate for the Staate.

Judgment

Heard learned counsel for the parties. The detenue is produced today before this Court.

2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner Sher Ali has sought writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for his production in the Court and has further prayed for setting him at liberty forthwith.

3. Brief facts of the case are that petitioner Sher Ali appears to be one of the accused in Case Crime No. 3979 of 2007, relating to offences punishable under Section 302/34 of I.P.C., registered with police station Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. Complainant Idrish Ahmad lodged the first information report stating that his brother Illiyas was shot dead by one Danish @ Manni, Paras Rana and two others. The petitioner is not named in the first information report as is apparent from the copy of the first information report, which is Annexure -1 to the writ petition. The Order dated 26th of October 2007, passed by learned Single Judge of this Court, on Bail Application No. 1203 of 2007 (a copy of which is Annexure - 2 to the writ petition) shows that applicant Sher Ali, who was arrested in connection with aforesaid crime, was directed to be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furni








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top