RAJESH TANDON
Mangali Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal – Respondent
Rule, Respondents waive service. Both the parties agreed that the matter may be decided finally.
2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
(1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents to appoint the son of the petitioner under Dying in Harness Rules and to pay the petitioner back salary due pension and gratuity with interest within the time allowed by this Hon'ble Court.
(2) Issue any other suitable writ order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.
(3) Award cost of the petition to the petitioner.
3. Brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the husband of the petitioner was working under the Executive Engineer, Construction Division, Public Works Department Narendra Nagar, Tehri Garhwal, respondent NO.3 on the post of Beldar on daily wage basis since 1977 and he worked as daily wage employee up to the year 1979.
4. Thereafter the husband of the petitioner was taken as work charge employee on the post of Beldar since 1980 and he worked as such upto the year 1993 i.e. upto 5.6.1993. Thus the husband of the petitioner worked for about a period o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.