SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(UK) 9

RAJESH TANDON
Parwati Pande – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sri Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

JUDGMENT - Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length.

2.By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing paragraph no. 24 of Government Order dated 17.12.1965 and commanding the respondents to release family pension in favour of the petitioner.

3. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the husband of the petitioner late Sri Narayan Dutt Pandey was posted as Principal, in Junior High School, Mallital, Nainital who retired after superannuating age on 31.10.1974. Sri Narayan Dutt Pandey was getting pension during his life time. The petitioner has stated that after the death of her husband she has moved a representation before the Director; Education Basic Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow for granting her family pension. The matter was referred to the Finance and Accounts Officer (Finance Controller), Allahabad, who ultimately rejected the representation of the petitioner vide order dated 3.7.1999 on the ground that as per paragraph 24 of G.O. No. A-5355/15-5133-1962 dated 17.12.1965, the family pension can be given only for the period of 10 years or up to the age





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top