SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(UK) 219

J.C.S.RAWAT
Surendra. @ Chikna – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sri Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the appellants.
Sri H.C. Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State.

Judgement –

Both these two criminal appeals under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been filed against the .same judgment and order dated 25-8-2003 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Dehradun in S.T. No. 75/2002 State Vs. Umesh Dimri and others, whereby the Sessions Judge has convicted Umesh Dimri @ Mukesh Dlmri, Surendra @ Chikna & Rakesh @ Raka and sentenced them to undergo RI for five years under section 307 read with section 34 IPC and further to pay fine of Rs. 2000/- each and In default of payment of fine all the convicts shall have to undergo further rigorous Imprisonment for six months each. However, Umesh Dimri @ Mukesh Dimri, Surendra @ Chikna and Rakesh @ Raka were acquitted from the charge under section 504 IPC.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 5-4-2002 at about 4PM Om Prakash Yadav (PW-l) - an Ice cream seller was coming to his house after selling the ice cream and on the way when he reached near Shiv Mandir, M.D.D.A. Colony, Kedarpuram accused-Umesh Dimri @ Mukesh Dimri, Surendra @ Chikna and Rakesh .@ Raka met him there and they stopped him. Accused persons then demanded money from him for purchasing the liquor. When he refused to give the money





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top