J.C.S.RAWAT
R. P. Purohit – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the applicants/revisionists and perused the record.
2. According to the prosecution case, the accused were challenged under Section 8/20 of N.D.P.S. Act and after recording the evidence, the Sessions Judge has come to the conclusion that prosecution was able to prove the guilt against the accused persons. After recording the acquittal of the accused, learned Additional Sessions Judge directed the police officials, who were involved in the recovery and investigation, which was recovered from his personal search that shall be recovered from their pay as well as from G.P.F. It was further observed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge that the accused were in Jail for eight months for which Rs. 1 lac each will be paid by the police officials within a period of one month to the accused as a compensation. Thereafter, the police department will recover such amount from the erring police personnel from their pay or G.P.F.
3. Learned counsel for the revisionists has filed present revision petition feeling aggrieved by the said order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge with regard to the recovery of Rs. 1 lac against the revisionists.
4. By
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.