CYRIAC JOSEPH, RAJESH TANDON
Sunil Kumar Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
Nandan Arya – Respondent
(Per Hon'ble the Chief Justice)
1. The petitioner who filed this Criminal Contempt Petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is the only petitioner in Writ Petition No. 991 of 2004 (M/B). He prays for summoning the respondents and punishing them in accordance with law for committing wilful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court.
2. The respondents in this petition are (1) Sri Nandan Arya, Additional Government Advocate, state of Uttaranchal, Nainital; (2) Asarhu Lal Arya, Inspector, Vigilance Establishment, State of Uttaranchal, Dehradun and (3) Sri Amit Agarwal, S/o Sri Naveen Agarwal, R/o 61/2 Balveer Road Dehradun. The allegation is that when Writ Petition No. 991 of 2004 (M/B) came up for hearing before a Division Bench of this Court on 20-04-2005, the first respondent, acting at the behest of respondents Nos. 2 and 3, made a false statement before the Court that charge-sheet in the criminal case from which the said writ petition arose had been flied against the petitioner and in view of the said statement, the writ petition was dismissed as Infructuous. It is stated that the aforesaid sta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.