SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(UK) 254

K.S.GUPTA, R.K.BATTA
Goutam Das – Appellant
Versus
Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Mr. A.K. Sil and Mr. Partha Sil, Advocates.
For the Opposite Parties: None.

ORDER

K.S. Gupta, Presiding Member—Complaint was filed, inter alia, alleging that Dr. Krishna Das, wife of the complainant and also the complainant are doctors by profession. Dr. Krishna Das held 400 equity share of Rs.10 each of opposite party No.1, the details whereof have been set out in para No.3 of the complaint. vide letter dated 29.10.1994, opposite party No. 1 informed Dr. Krishna Das of allotting certain additional shares. In April, 2000 Dr. Krishna Das and the complainant jointly acquired 800 equity shares of Rs.10 each of opposite party No. 1 as detailed in para No. 5 of the complaint. Shares were held by both of them for personal investment. Dr. Krishna Das died on 29.10.2009. Along with the letter dated 12.12.2009, the complainant forwarded certificates of said 1,200 equity shares to opposite party No.1 for getting them transferred in his name. Vide letter dated 30.12.2009 the opposite party No.1 intimated the complainant that against those certificates, duplicate shares have been issued in past. Those duplicate shares were transferred in the name of Jatindra Shukla in July 2007 which were subsequently dematerialized through Karvy Stock Broking Limited. It was claimed t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top