SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(UK) 66

A.A.DESAI, M.C.JAIN
Chandra Mohan Pande – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.A. DESAI & M.C. JAIN, J. Mr. Manoj Tewari, learned counsel for the petitioner, canvassed before us a settled proposition that suspension can not be as a matter of course. The suspension can be resorted to by the department having regard to the nature of charge, its gravity and implication. According to learned counsel, the suspension is without application of mind We heard him at length. He has also referred certain documents.

2. Undisputedly, certain contractors carried work of widening of the road even in absence of acceptance of their bid or contract. This aspect certainly has a serious implication. The department has already suspended the Executive Engineer, who is facing inquiry. In the instant suspension of the Assistant Engineers, we do not see any impropriety. We,' therefore, do not propose to interfere with.

3. However, the department shall frame charge and complete the inquiry expeditiously.

he writ petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top