SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(UK) 436

B.C.KANDPAL
Jamil of – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri K. S. Verma for Applicants
A.G.A. for Opp. Party

JUDGMENT

B. C. Kandpal, J.

This r application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed against the order dated 10.5.2005 passed by Learned 1st Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Division) Haridwar and also against the order dated 17.8.2005 passed by the Learned Sessions Judge Haridwar in case crime No. 151 of 2002 and case crime No. 285 of 2002 State versus Saleem and others.

2. Brief facts giving rise to this application are that a First Information Report was lodged on 12.7.2002 by opposite Party No.2 against petitioner No. 3 Nashim under Section 363/366 IPC.

3. The applicants/accused No. 1 and 2 were granted bail by the Learned Sessions Judge, Haridwar on 24.9.2002 and accused appellant No. 3 was granted bail by this Hon'ble High Court on 25.11.2002.

4. Thereafter the investigating Officer submitted charge sheet against all the applicants/accused and one Naseem under Section 366, 363, 369, 376 and 120B IPC. The learned 1st Additional civil Judge (Jr. Division) Haridwar vide order dated 10.5.2005 directed the applicants/accused to appear and move bail application under Section 376, 120 (B) IPC before' 19.5.2005.

5. The applicants/accused moved their bail application before the learned Sessi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top