Rajesh Tandon, J.

Heard Sri Arvind Vashisth, Counsel for the petitioners and Sri. B.P. Nautiyal and Sri Hari Mohan Bhatia, Counsel for the respondents.

FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:-

1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for a writ of certiorari praying for quashing the order 13th June, 1997 (Annexure 9) passed by the Prescribed Authority/1 st Additional Civil Judge, Senior Division, Dehradun passed in P.A. Case No. 5 of 1988 and judgment an order dated 7.2.2002 passed by 1st Additional District Judge, Dehradun in Rent Control Appeal No. 63 of 1997.

2. Briefly stated, the application was filed under Section 21 (1) (a) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 in respect of the shop situate in 487 Dakra Bazar, Dehradun at the rate of Rs. 8/- per month. In Paragraph 3 of the application, it was stated by the respondent No. 3 Sri Chandra Shekhar that the premises is in a dilapidated condition and the landlord has got prepared a map according to the regulations of the Cantonment Board.

3. In Paragraph 6 of the application, it has been mentioned that on 31st August, 2002, he has retired and after his retirement he has no place to run his own business and he will start the t