SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(UK) 462

DHARAM VEER
NACHHATAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. G.A.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Dharam Veer, J.

Heard Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State. None appeared for the respondent no. 2 despite being served personally.

2. By means of this petition, moved under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, CrPC), the petitioner has prayed for quashing the summoning order dated 22.5.2004 passed by the Addl. Civil Judge Ist (Jr. Div.)/J.M., Dehradun in Complaint Case No. 1331 of 2004 (Old No. 14/2004), Manish Kumar v. Ravindra Pal Singh & Ors. Under Section 420 IPC.

3. Facts, in brief, are that the respondent no. 2 lodged a complaint against the petitioner and other co-accused before the Court of CJM, Dehradun stating that Ravindra Pal Singh and Davindra Pal Singh are brothers who induced the complainant/respondent no. 2 that they can get him a job in foreign country which will cost about Rs. 3,20,000/-. The complainant agreed to the offer for his better future. On 1.3.2003, when the complainant met Ravindra Pal Singh and Davindra Pal Singh at their residence, they asked him to give Rs. 3100/- for obtaining the NOC from the Income-tax Department. The complainant gave them Rs. 3100/- as






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top