SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(UK) 199

PRAFULLA C.PANT, V.K.BIST
SHOMPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr.
For the State : Mr.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. : Both these appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 28.06.2007, passed by Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in Sessions Trial no. 350 of 2004, Sessions Trial No. 351 of 2004, and Sessions Trial No. 352 of 2004, whereby said court has convicted accused/appellant Shompal under section 302, 452, 307/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC), and under section 25 Arms act, and another accused/appellant Rohit @ Rohtas under section 452, 307, 302 read with section 34 IPC, and also under section 25 Arms Act. Accused/appellant Shompal has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and directed to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- under section 302 IPC, and rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years under section 307/34 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years under section 452 IPC, and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under section 25 Arms Act. Accused/appellant Rohit @ Rohtas has been sentenced to imprisonment for life, and directed to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- under section 302/34 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years under section 307 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years under sec





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top