PRAFULLA C.PANT, V.K.BIST
SHOMPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Hon’ble Prafulla C. Pant, J. : Both these appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 28.06.2007, passed by Sessions Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in Sessions Trial no. 350 of 2004, Sessions Trial No. 351 of 2004, and Sessions Trial No. 352 of 2004, whereby said court has convicted accused/appellant Shompal under section 302, 452, 307/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC), and under section 25 Arms act, and another accused/appellant Rohit @ Rohtas under section 452, 307, 302 read with section 34 IPC, and also under section 25 Arms Act. Accused/appellant Shompal has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and directed to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- under section 302 IPC, and rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years under section 307/34 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years under section 452 IPC, and rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year under section 25 Arms Act. Accused/appellant Rohit @ Rohtas has been sentenced to imprisonment for life, and directed to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- under section 302/34 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years under section 307 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years under sec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.