SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(UK) 75

2012 (1) UAD 767
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.M. Lodha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice H.L. Gokhale
Civil Appeal No. 2689 of 2012
JITU PATNAIK – Appellant
Versus
SANATAN MOHAKUD & ORS. – Respondents
Decided on : 02.03.2012

For the Appellant :Mr. C.A. Sundram, Sr. Adv., Ms. Rohini Musa, Mr. Zafar Inayat, Mr. Yogesh Kotemath, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Shakti Prasad Panda, Mr. Satyajit Mohanti, Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Bidyadhar Mishra, Sr. Advs., Mr. S.N. Bhat, Mr. Sanjeeb Panigrahi, Mr. Pusparaj Bharadwaj, Mr. Subhash Acharya, Mr. Shyam Mohan, Mr. Ninad Laud, Advocates

Headnote:(A) Representation of People Act, 1951, Secs. 36, 38, 52 as amended in 1996 and Instruction provided in Handbook issued to returning officer — Death of an independent candidate after publication of list of contesting candidates under Sec. 38 and before poll — Held — Adjournment of poll can be announced by the returning officer only in case of death of a candidate set up by a recognised political party before the poll as envisaged u/s 52 of the 1951 Act, as amended by amendment made in 1996. (Paras 13 to 26)

       (B) Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Or. 6, Rule 2 — Pleadings — Mandatory requirements — Pleading to state material facts and not evidence — Every pleading shall contain, and contain only, a statement in a concise form of the material facts on which the party pleading relies for his claim or defence as the case may be, but not the evidence by which they are to be proved. (Para 30)

       (C) Representaiton of People Act, 1951, Sec. 83(1)(a) — Election petition — Material facts are such facts which afford a basis for the allegations made in the election petition. (Paras 32 to 34)

       (D) "Material facts" and "particulars" — Distinction — 'Material facts" are primary or basic facts which must be pleaded by the plaintiff or by the defendant in support of the case set up by him either to prove his cause of action or defence — "Particulars" on the other hand, are details in support of material facts pleaded by the party — They amplify, refine and embellish material facts by giving distinctive touch to the basic contours of a picture already drawn so as to make it full, more clear and more informative — "Particulars" thus ensure conduct of fair trial and would not take the opposite party by surprise. (Para 33)

       (E) Representation of People Act, 1951, Secs. 100(1)(d)(iii), (iv), 83(1)(a) and Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Or. VI, Rule 16 r/w Sec. 151 and Or. 7, Rule 11 — Election petition — Pleadings with out concise statements of material facts disclosing cause of action — Such certain pleadings struck out by High Court and Election Tribunal leaving two — The remaining two were struck out by Hon'ble Supreme Court — Where there is no cause of action surviving — Election Petition liable to be rejected. (Paras 26 to 29, 36 to 43)

        ¼v½ yksd izfrfuf/k vf/kfu;e] 1951] /kkjk 36] 38] 52 tSlk fd 1996 esa la'kksf/kr vkSj fuokZpu vf/kdkjh dks tkjh iqfLrdk esa iznku funsZ'k & /kkjk 38 ds rgr pquko yM+ jgs mEehnokjksa dh lwph ds izdk'ku ds ckn ,d Lora= mEehnokj dh ekSr pquko ls igys & /kkfjr fd & pquko dk LFkxu ,d mEehnokj dh ekSr ds ekeys esa fuokZpu vf/kdkjh }kjk ?kksf"kr fd;k tk ldrk gS] tks fd ,d ekU;rk izkIr jktuhfrd ny }kjk tuer ls igys & tSlk fd ifjdfYir gS u/s 52, vf/kfu;e] 1951] tSlk fd la'kksf/kr gS 1996 ds la'kks/ku esaA ¼izLrj 13 lsa 26½

       ¼c½ nhokuh izfØ;k lafgrk] 1908] vkns'k 6] fu;e 2 & okn & vfuok;Z vko';drk,¡ & izkFkZuk vfr vko';d rF;ksa dks crkus ds fy, u fd vkSj lcwrksa dh & gj izkFkZuk esa gksuk pkfg, flQZ vkSj flQZ ,d mYys[k] laf{kIr :i esa t:jh rF;ksa dk ftl ij izkFkZuk djus okyh ikVhZ fuHkZj dj lds vius nkos ;k cpko ds fy, tSlk Hkh ekeyk gks] ijUrq og lk{; ugha ftl ij rF;ksa dks lkfcr fd;k tkuk gksA ¼izLrj 30½

       ¼l½ yksd izfrfuf/k vf/kfu;e] 1951] /kkjk 83¼1½¼d½ & pquko ;kfpdk & vfr vko';d rF; ,sls rR; gSa tks pquko ;kfpdk esa fd, x, vkjksiksa ds fy, ,d vk/kkj dk ogu djrs gSaA ¼izLrj 32 ls 34½

       ¼n½ ßlkexzh rF;Þ vkSj ßfooj.kÞ & Hksn & vfr vko';d rF; ßizkFkfed ;k cqfu;knh rF; gksrs gSa tks oknh }kjk ;k mlds }kjk LFkkfir ekeys ds leFkZu esa ;k izfroknh }kjk mlds dkj.k lkfcr djus ds fy, ;k j{kk ds fy, pkfg, gSa & nwljs gkFk ij] fooj.k] C;kSjk gSa rF;ks ds leFkZu esa vfr vko';d rF;ksa dk ftudh ikVhZ }kjk odkyr dh xbZ & os c<+krs gSa] ifj"Ñr djrs gSa ,d rLohj ds ewy Lo:i dks vkSj mls iwjk rS;kj djus ds fy, fof'k"V Li'kZ nsrs gSa] vkSj vf/kd Li"V lq'kksfHkr vkSj vf/kd lwpukRed C;ksjk nsus ds fy, & fooj.k ßbl rjg fu"i{k lquokbZ dk lapkyu lqfuf'pr djrs gSa vkSj foijhr ikVhZ dks vk'p;Z ugha nsrsA ¼izLrj 33½

       ¼;½ yksd izfrfuf/k vf/kfu;e] 1951] /kkjk 100(1)(d)(iii), (iv), 83(1)(a) vkSj nhokuh izfØ;k lafgrk] 1908] vkns'k 6] fu;e 16 lifBr /kkjk 151 vkSj vkns'k 7] fu;e 11 & pquko ;kfpdk & izkFkZuk cxSj vfr vko';d rF;ksa ds laf{kIr mYys[k ds tks dkj.k izdV rF;ksa dk C;kSjk ns & bl rjg ds dqN okn mPp U;k;ky; vkSj pquko fVªC;wuy }kjk NksM+s x, flQZ nks dks NksM+dj vkSj ckdh nks dks mPpre U;k;ky; us vLohdkj dj fn;k & tgk¡ dk;Zokgh dk dksbZ dkj.k ekStwn ugha] pquko ;kfpdk fujLr gksus ;ksX;A

        ¼izLrj 26 ls 29] 36 ls 43½

JUDGMENT

R.M. Lodha. J. — Leave granted.

2. The two paragraphs - 7(A) and 7(D) - of the election petition occupied significant time of this Court on 3 days - February 7, 2012, February 9, 2012 and February 14, 2012 - to determine the correctness of the order dated June 21,2011 passed by the Orissa High Court whereby the High Court directed that the election petition shall proceed in respect of the pleadings contained in these two paragraphs.

3. On the announcement of the 14th Assembly Election to the Orissa State Legislative Assembly, insofar as it related to 25 Champua Assembly Constituency, the following schedule of election was notified:

SCHEDULE OF ELECTION

28.3.2009 To PERIOD PRESCRIBED FOR FILLlNG NOMINATION.

4.4.2009

6.4.2009 DATE FIXED FOR SCRUTINY OF NOMINATION

8.4.2009 DATE OF WITHDRAWAL

23.4.2009 DATE OF POLLING

16.5.2009 DATE OF COUNTING/DECLARATION OF RESULT.

28.5.2009 DATE BEFORE WHICH THE ELECTION SHALL BE COMPLETED.

4. As per the above schedule, on expiry of the time of withdrawal on April 8, 2009, the returning officer prepared and published the following list of contesting candidates.

Sl. Name of the contesting Name of the political Election symbol

No. candidate party

1. Chitaranjan Nayek B.S.P. Elephant

2. Bidyadhar Mohanta C.P.I. Ears of Corn and Sickle 3. Murlimanohar Sharma B.J.P. Lotus

4. Laxman Kumar Sethi J.M.M. Bow & Arrow

5. Sanatan Mahakud I.N.C. Hand

6. Keshab Mohanta Samrudha Orissa Nagara

7. Khitish Chandra Mohanta Orissa Mukti Morcha Violin

8. Jadumani Patra Samajbadi Party Saw

9. Akhila Kumar Mohanta Independent Television

10. Akhileswar Giri Independent Battery & Torch

11. Abhirnanyu Mohanta Independent Coconut

12. Arabinda Behera Independent Ripe Plantation

13. Ashok Mohanta Independent Road Roller

14. Kusha Apot Independent Scissors

15. Jitu Patnaik Independent Saucer & Plate

16. Deepak Moharana Independent Camera

17. Puma Chandra Mohanta Independent Baloon

18. Prabhupada Mishra Independent Almirah

19. Buta Singh Independent Ceiling Fan

20. Bhabani Mohanta Independent Candle

21. Manoj Kumar Mohanta Independent Rail Engine

22. Sanjita Nayek Independent Batsman

5. It so happened that one of the contesting candidates at Sl. No.9, namely, Akhila Kumar Mohanta, who was an independent candidate, died on April 13, 2009. His death was allegedly informed to the returning officer. However, his name continued to appear in the list of contesting candidates and was included in Electronic Voting Machine (EVM). The polling was held on April 23, 2009 in all 218 booths of the 25-Champua Assembly Constituency through EVM. The total votes recorded in the EVMs of 218 booths were 1,25,342 and postal ballots were 10. The appellant, Jitu Patnaik who contested as an independent candidate secured 27700 votes. The first respondent, Sanatan Mohakud, a candidate of Indian National Congress, secured 27555 votes. The deceased Akhila Kumar Mohanta got 550 votes. Since the appellant secured the highest number of votes, he was declared elected from 25-Champua Assembly Constituency.

6. The first respondent (hereinafter referred to as ‘election petitioner’) challenged the election of the appellant (hereinafter referred to as ‘returned candidate’) by filing an election petition before the Orissa High Court. In paragraphs 7(A) to 7(G), the election petitioner set out the case for declaring the election of the returned candidate to be void and declare the election petitioner duly elected to the Orissa State Legislative Assembly from 25-Champua Assembly Constituency.

7. On service of the notice of the election petition, the returned candidate appeared and filed his written statement/reply traversing the pleadings set out in the election petition. The returned candidate also made an application under Order VI Rule 16 read with Section 151 and Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) read with Section




































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top