Heard Sri Subhash Upadhyaya, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri N.S. Pundir, the learned Brief Holder for the State.

2. This group of petitions raise a common question and are being decided together. For facility, the facts in Writ Petition No. 1364 (S/S) of 2011 is being taken into consideration.

3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21st April, 2011, by which an Enquiry Officer was appointed in contemplation of the disciplinary proceedings being initiated against the petitioner. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the order dated 20th July, 2011, by which the disciplinary authority suspended the petitioner and directed the Enquiry Officer to issue a charge sheet under his signature.

4. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition is, that the petitioner was initially appointed as an Assistant Agriculture Officer Group II in the year 1994 and was posted under Project Officer (Agriculture), Pithoragarh. It is alleged that since 1994 till date, the petitioner has an unblemished record and that there is no adverse entry against him. In the year 2010, the petitioner was transferred from Haridwar to Chamoli and, since then, was working und