SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(UK) 155

Alok Singh
GHANSHYAM LAMBA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant :Mr. R.S. Sammal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. H.O. Bhakuni, Brief Holder

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J (Oral).

This is an application seeking regular bail in case crime no. 391 of 2012 under Sections 420, 465, 468, 470, 471, 467, 120B IPC, police station Kotwali Ranipur, District Haridwar.

2. Brief facts of the present case, inter alia, are that initially, Ultratech Cement Company had issued a cheque bearing no. 044998 dated 19.09.2012 of Rs. 87,100/- in favour of CPR Distributors Pvt. Limited; the cheque was encashed on 26.09.2012; meanwhile, a scanned copy of cheque was prepared and amount of Rs. 25,50,00,000/- was written on the scanned copy of cheque and the cheque was shown to have been issued in favour of Shree Jyoti Gramodyog Sansthan by the present applicant; accused applicant approached Prem Chandra Saini, Praveen Kumar and Darshana and made them to understand that if cheque is deposited in the account of Shree Jyoti Gramodyog Sansthan belonging to Prem Chandra Saini, then it would be easily encashed. Cheque was deposited in the account of Shree Jyoti Gramodyog Sansthan. However, cheque was returned, which was received by Prem Chandra Saini, thereafter, under the planning name of one Keshav Kumar was entered in the scanned cheque and the ch




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top