SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(UK) 587

U.C.DHYANI
Devki Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

PW4 Parmanand wrote a complaint (Ext. Ka-1) on 09.01.2000 to Station Officer, police station, Kotwali Jhulaghat, Pithoragarh regarding death of his daughter. As per complaint, complainantâ daughter Hari Priya was married to Satish Chandra about two years ago (from the date of writing of complaint). On 09.01.2000, at 08:30 p.m., Neela Dhar, Suresh and an unknown person came to PW4 house and informed about the death of his daughter. The victim went to her matrimonial home on 09.01.2000, at 04:00 p.m. (from her parental home). PW4 suspected unnatural death of his daughter. He went to the matrimonial home of his daughter along with some persons. According to PW4, the victim was killed and thereafter hanged. PW4â„¢s daughter had the apprehension that she would be killed. She used to tell PW4 that her mother-in-law Smt. Devki Devi and husband Satish Chandra Bhatt harassed her for want of bringing sufficient dowry. On the basis of the complaint of PW4, chik FIR was registered on 10.01.2000, at 04.15 a.m., at police station Jhulaghat, District Pithoragarh, under Section 304B of IPC against Devki Devi and Satish Chandra Bhatt. The incident allegedly took place on 09.01.2000. The di
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top