SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(UK) 9

U.C.DHYANI
Ajay Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


ORDER

The applicants, by means of present application under S. 482, Cr. P.C., seek to quash the charge-sheet dated 13-11-2006, summoning order dated 29.11.2006 as well as the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 759 of 2009, captioned as State v. Anoop Tiwari and others, under Sections 323, 504 and 506, IPC.

2. Informant (respondent No. 2) lodged the first information report on 24.08.2006 against five unknown persons at PS Sitarganj, under Sections 395/397, IPC. After the investigation, a charge-sheet was submitted against four accused persons, namely, Anoop Tiwari, Vikram Singh, Vikrant and Ajay Yadav for the offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Cognizance was taken on the said charge-sheet and accused persons were summoned to face the trial for the selfsame offences. Aggrieved against the same, present application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. was filed.

3. According to the first information report, respondent No. 2 was the registered owner of Mahindra pickup. One Sunder Bahadur was the driver of the said vehicle. The vehicle was financed by Mahindra and Mahindra Finance Company Limited, Haldwani. On 23.08.2006, at 2:00 p.m., five unknown persons came to the transport company o












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top