SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(UK) 578

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh
Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 1609 of 2012 (S/S)
BABU RAM – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. – Respondents
Decided on : 20.12.2013

Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: Mr. Subhash Upadhyay, Standing Counsel
For the Respondent No. 8:Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate
For the Respondent No. 9:Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, Advocate

Headnote:Service Matter — Appointment under the direct recruitment quota by way of transfer, without undertaking the exercise to find out suitable Assistant teacher for promotion — Post of Lecturer in question, to be filled up by promotion only and was not available for the direct recruitment — Therefore, appointment of respondent no. 9 on transfer, illegal and not sustainable in the eyes of law.

        (Para 7)

        lsok okn & izksUufr ds fy, cxSj mi;qDr lgk;d v/;kid dh ryk’k djs vUrj.k }kjk izR;{k HkrhZ fu;rka’k ds vUrxZr fu;qfDr & dfFkr ysDpjj dk in izksUufr }kjk gh iw.kZ fd;k tkuk Fkk o dfFkr in izR;{k HkrhZ ds fy, miyC/k ugha Fkk & bl izdkj izfroknh lañ 9 dk vUrj.k] voS/kkfud o fof/k lEer ughaA ¼izLrj 7½

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J.

Undisputedly, in K.V. Inter College Laksar, Haridwar, petitioner was appointed as Assistant Teacher in the year 1974. Petitioner was having post graduate degree in Sociology as well as B.T.C. Undisputedly, Mr. Bhagat Ram Mittal was working as Lecturer (Sociology) in the same college. On account of retirement of Bhagat Ram Mittal in the year 1992, post of Lecturer (Sociology) has fallen vacant. Undisputedly, 50% post of lecturers were required to be filled up by promotion and 50% by direct recruitments. Undisputedly, one Shri Mahendra Pal was promoted on the post of Lecturer (Sociology). Later on promotion of Shri Mahendra Pal to the post of Lecturer (Sociology) was found to be illegal, therefore, vide order dated 17.03.1992, promotion in favour of Shri Mahendra Pal was revoked and he was demoted to the post of Assistant Teacher in the same college. Mahendra Pal challenged the cancellation/revocation of his promotion and continued to work on the promotional post under the interim stay. Ultimately, Mahendra Pal lost legal battle and post of Lecturer (Sociology) again has fallen vacant on 13.05.2010. On 13.05.2010 itself Manager of the College issued no objection to the Education Department for appointment on the post of Lecturer (Sociology) by transfer of Shri Ashvani Kumar, respondent No. 9 who at the relevant time was posted as Lecturer in Girls Inter College Khanpur.

2. Petitioner, being senior most Assistant Teacher, applied for the promotional post of Lecturer (Sociology). His candidature was not considered, therefore, he preferred writ petition before this Court, being writ petition No. 703 of 2010 (S/S), which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 16th August, 2010 directing the authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner seeking promotion on the post of Lecturer (Sociology). Representation so moved by the petitioner came to be rejected vide order dated 9th October, 2010 on two grounds namely;

(i) Requisite qualification for the post of Lecturer (Sociology) was post graduate degree in the subject alongwith B.Ed. While, petitioner was having only qualification of M.A. and B.T.C. and was not B.Ed.

(ii) Petitioner applied for promotion on 14.05.2010 while Manager had already issued no objection on 13.05.2010 in favour of Ashvani Kumar, respondent No. 9 herein for appointment by transfer in the college under the direct recruitment quota on the post of Lecturer (Sociology). Therefore, when petitioner moved application seeking promotion, post was not available.

3. I have heard Mr. Sudhir Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 5, Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate for respondent No. 8 and Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, Advocate for respondent No. 9 and have carefully perused the record.

4. Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir, Advocate contends that although he had earlier filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent Nos. 6, 7 and 8, however, as on day Committee of Management is not working and Authorised Controller has already been appointed, therefore, he is appearing on behalf of respondent No. 8 only.

5. Undisputedly, Mahendra Pal was promoted on the post of Lecturer (Sociology) on account of retirement of Shri Bhagat Ram Mittal, the then Lecturer (Sociology) under the promotion quota. Undisputedly, promotion of Mahendra Pal was revoked. Ultimately, on 13.05.2010, post of Lecturer (Sociology) has fallen vacant under the promotion quota. Undisputedly, on account of demotion of Mahendra Pal, no exercise was undertaken to promote eligible Assistant Teacher for the post of Lecturer (Sociology) and without there being any exercise to find out the suitable candidate to be appointed as Lecturer (Sociology) by way of promotion, no objection was issued by the Manager of the College to appoint Shri Ashvani Kumar respondent No. 9, therefore, Shri Ashvani Kumar was appointed under the direct recruitment quota on the p














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top