SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(UK) 45

ALOK SINGH
CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT ELECTRONICS LTD. , KOTDWAR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners:Mr. N.S. Negi, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J (Oral)

Present petition is filed assailing the order dated 16.03.2009 passed by Electricity, Ombudsman, Uttarakhand, whereby penalty imposed on the consumer/respondent, herein, for violating the peak hour restriction, was set aside.

2. Brief facts of the present case, inter alia, are that UPCL approached the State Electricity Regulatory Commission with its proposal for regulating the supply of electricity to the consumers during 05.00 p.m. to 10 p.m. from January to March, 2007; Regulatory Commission vide order dated 09.01.2007 was pleased to approve the proposal of the UPCL with effect from 10.01.2007 to 15.03.2007; thereafter, on 19.01.2007, UPCL again approached the Regulatory Commission with the proposal that all the industries in the State may be permitted to use 15% of their sanctioned load daily during the peak hours; Regulatory Commission approved that restriction on 25.01.2007; although as per approval granted by Regulatory Commission, all industries were permitted to use only 15% of their sanctioned load daily during the peak hours; however, consumer respondent, herein, was granted exemption from the peak hours restrictions by CMD of UPCL




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top