IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Servesh Kumar Gupta, Barin Ghosh, JJ.
Anant Naithani - Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others - Respondents
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 46 Of 2012
Decided On : 15.04.2013
Hindu Marriage Act - Arya Samajists - The court discussed the overriding effect of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 over any text, rule, or interpretation of Hindu law, and the validation of inter-caste marriage under the Arya Marriage Validation Act, 1937. The judgment clarified that any Hindu who believes in inter-caste marriage should be deemed an Arya Samajist, and that marriage certificates issued by Arya Samaj Mandirs have no legal effect except as a witness certificate.
Fact of the Case:
The court discussed the validation of inter-caste marriage under the Arya Marriage Validation Act, 1937 and the issuance of marriage certificates by Arya Samaj Mandirs.
Finding of the Court:
The court clarified that the Hindu Marriage Act has an overriding effect and that marriage certificates issued by Arya Samaj Mandirs have no legal effect except as a witness certificate. The writ petition was disposed of.
Issues: Interpretation of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Arya Marriage Validation Act, 1937, and the validity of marriage certificates issued by Arya Samaj Mandirs.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the overriding effect of the Hindu Marriage Act and clarified the definition of Arya Samajists as Hindus who believe in inter-caste marriage.
Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of, and the court declared that marriage certificates issued by Arya Samaj Mandirs have no legal effect except as a witness certificate.
Barin Ghosh, J.
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, as provided in Section 4 thereof, has an overriding effect over any text, rule or interpretation of Hindu law or any custom or usage as part of that law in force immediately before the commencement of the Act or any other law in force immediately before the commencement of the Act. Section 5 of the Act provides, amongst others, that a marriage may be solemnized between any two Hindu if, amongst others, the condition that the bridegroom has completed the age of twenty –one years and the bride the age of eighteen years at the time of marriage has been complied with. Every Hindu, governed by the said Act, is bound by the conditions mentioned therein. Prior to coming into force of the Hindu Marriage Act, The Arya Marriage Validation Act, 1937 came into force. The said Act validated inter-caste marriage between Hindus. Inter-caste marriage being not barred under the Hindu Marriage Act, The Arya Marriage Validation Act, 1937 is still in force. The writ petition seeks a direction upon the Court to identify Arya Samajists. A look at the provisions of the Arya Marriage Validation Act, 1937 would make it amply clear that Arya Samajists are those Hindus, who believe in inter-caste marriage. Therefore, any Hindu, who believes in inter-caste marriage, should be deemed to be an Arya Samajist. It has been contended in the writ petition that Arya Samaj Mandirs situate in the State are solemnizing marriages and issuing certificates pertaining to such marriages. The fact remains that Arya Marriage Validation Act, 1937 does not contemplate granting of any marriage certificate, nor the same authorises any person, juristic or otherwise, to certify any such marriage. On the other hand, the Hindu Marriage Act permits registration of Hindu marriages. Therefore, in this writ petition, the only declaration that can be granted is that a marriage certificate issued by any Arya Samaj Mandir has no legal effect, except a certificate given by the person issuing the certificate of marriage that he was a witness to the marriage.
2. The writ petition is disposed of.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.