SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(UK) 84

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Alok Singh, J.
Trilok Singh – Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate Bageshwar and Others – Respondents
WP (M/S) No. 75, 77, 78, 79 of 2015
Decided On : 19.1.2015

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General for the State-Respondent.
Mr. K.K. Sah, Advocate for Respondent.

The provisions of the U.P. Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972, can only be invoked in specific cases related to loan agreements, advances, grants, or hire-purchase of goods sold by specified entities, as interpreted by the court.

Headnote:

Recovery of Dues - Loan Agreement - U.P. Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 - Section 3

Fact of the Case:

The borrowers failed to make repayment of the financial assistance received from the bank, leading the bank to issue recovery certificates to the collector for recovery of the outstanding amount as arrears of land revenue under Section 3 of the U.P. Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the provisions of Section 3 (1) of the Act could only be invoked in specific cases related to loan agreements, advances, grants, or hire-purchase of goods sold by specified entities, and since the loan in question did not meet these criteria, the recovery certificates were quashed.

Issues: The main issue was whether the outstanding amount could be recovered by invoking the provisions of the U.P. Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the provisions of Section 3 (1) of the Act and relied on the decision in Iqbal Naseer Usmani vs. Central Bank of India and Others, (2006) 2 SCC 241, to establish that the financial assistance must be in relation to hire-purchase of goods sold to the borrower by specified entities for the provisions to be invoked.

Final Decision: All the petitions were allowed, and the impugned citations were quashed. The bank was granted the liberty to proceed against the petitioners to recover the outstanding amount in accordance with the law.

JUDGMENT

Alok Singh, J.


1. In all these writ petitions, identical questions of facts and law are involved, therefore, all these petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Petitioners of all the petitions are borrower, who have taken loan/financial assistance from the bank i.e. Uttarakhand Gramin Bank under the loan agreement available on each file as Annexure no.2. Since, petitioners failed to make repayment of the financial assistance received by them, bank was pleased to issue recovery certificates to the collector for recovery of the outstanding amount as arrears of land revenue under Section 3 of the U.P. Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972.

3. Now, question arises - As to whether outstanding amount can be recovered by invoking the provisions of the U.P. Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972?

Section 3 of the Act reads as under:

“Recovery of certain dues as arrears of land revenue – (1) Where any person is party -

(a) To any agreement relating to a loan, advance or grant given to him or relating to credit in respect of, or relating to hire-purchase of goods, sold to him by the State Government or the Corporation, by way of financial assistance.

(b) To any agreement relating to a loan, advance or grant given to him or relating to credit in respect of, or relating to hire-purchase of goods sold to him by a banking company or a Government Company, as the case may be, under a State sponsored scheme.

(c) To any agreement relating to a guarantee given by the State Government or the Corporation in respect of a loan raised by an industrial concern.”

(d) To any agreement providing that any money payable thereunder to the State Government [or any Corporation] shall be recoverable as arrears of land revenue; and such person –

(i) Makes any default in repayment of the loan or advance or any installment thereof.

(ii) Having become liable under the conditions of the grant to refund the grant or any portion thereof, makes any default in the refund of such grant or portion of any installment thereof.

(iii) Otherwise fails to comply with the terms of the agreement.

4. Then, in the case of the State Government, such officer as may be authorised in that behalf by the State Government by notification in the Official Gazette, and in the case of Corporation or a Government Company the Managing Director [or where there is no Managing Director then the Chairman of the Corporation, by whatever name called] [or such officer of the Corporation or Government Company as may be authorised in that behalf by the Managing Director or the Chairman] thereof, and in the case of a banking company, the local agent, thereof, by whatever name called, may send a certificate to the Collector, mentioning the sum due from such person and requesting that such sum together with costs of the proceedings be recovered as if it were an arrear of land revenue.

(2) The Collector on receiving the certificates shall proceed to recover the amount stated therein as an arrear of land revenue.

(3) No suit for the recovery of any sum due as aforesaid shall lie in the civil court against any person referred to in sub-section (1).

[(4) In the case of any agreement referred to in sub-section (1) between any person referred to in that sub-section and the State Government or the Corporation, no arbitration proceedings shall lie at the instance of either party either for recovery of any sum claimed to be due under the said sub-section or for disputing the correctness of such claim:

Provided that whenever proceedings are taken against any person for the recovery of any such sum he may pay the amount claimed under protest to the officer taking such proceedings, and upon such payment the proceedings shall be stayed and the person against whom such proceedings were taken may make a reference under or otherwise enforce an arbitration agreement in respect of the amount to be paid, and the provisions of Section 183 of the Uttar Pradesh Land Revenu

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top