Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal
J.C.S. Rawat and D.K. Kotia, JJ.
Bhim Singh Rawat - Petitioner
Vs.
State of Uttarakhad and others - Respondents
Claim Petition No. 17/N.B./2007
Decided On : 16-12-2014
Compassionate Appointment - Public Services - U.P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 - Rule 5(1) - The court analyzed the nature of appointment under Dying in Harness Rules, emphasizing that it is an exception to the general rule of public service appointments and should be made in accordance with relevant rules and guidelines. The judgment highlighted the time limit for submitting an application and the purpose of granting such appointment to provide immediate relief to the distressed family. The court cited legal principles from Umesh Kumar Nagpal Vs. State of Haryana and J & K & others Vs. Sajad Ahmed Mir to support its decision.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought relief from a reversion order and appointment on compassionate grounds under the Dying in Harness Rules. The petitioner's father died in 1977, and the petitioner was appointed as a Lab Assistant in 1978. The petitioner was later promoted as a Junior Clerk, but the promotion was challenged, leading to a series of legal proceedings.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner's appointment as a Lab Assistant was not under the Dying in Harness Rules and that the right to seek employment under these rules ceased once the petitioner accepted the appointment. The court also held that the petitioner's promotion as a Junior Clerk was not in accordance with the statutory rules and was liable to be vitiated.
Issues: The issues revolved around the petitioner's entitlement to compassionate appointment, the legality of the petitioner's promotion, and the application of the Dying in Harness Rules.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that compassionate appointment should be made in accordance with relevant rules and guidelines, and highlighted the time limit for submitting an application under the Dying in Harness Rules. The court also cited legal principles from previous cases to support its decision.
Final Decision: The claim petition was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.
This claim petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief:
"In view of the facts mentioned in Para 6 above, the applicant prays for the following relief:
(i) That an order or direction to quash the reversion order dated 2.9.2006 (contained as Annexure-1) be passed.
(ii) That an order or direction to the opposite parties be passed to allow the petitioner to work and pay the arrears of salary of the post of Junior Clerk with all consequential benefits.
(iii) That any relief, which this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice, be passed.
(iv) That the cost of the petition be awarded to petitioner."
2. The petitioner was initially appointed in the Health Department as Lab Assistant pursuant to the order dated 8.2.1978 and he joined the services on 12.2.1978. Thereafter the petitioner was promoted as Junior Clerk on 21.7.1987 by order of the Joint Director, Medical Health and he was confirmed on the said post. The petitioner was reverted back to the post of Lab Assistant on 30.10.1997 and was placed as Class-IV employee as Lab Assistant in the establishment. The said promotion of petitioner in the year 1997 was challenged before the U.P. Public Services Tribunal and the said claim petition was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The claim petition was preferred by one Smt. Savitri Arya, who was aggrieved by the said promotion of the petitioner as she being senior to the petitioner, was left over by the department concerned. The petitioner had been serving as Junior Clerk for the last 10 years and he has been abruptly reverted back to the post of Lab Assistant without any rhyme and reason in the year 1997. The said matter was challenged before the Hon'ble High Court of Lucknow Bench in writ petition and the matter was transferred to the Hon'ble Uttarakhand High Court. The Hon'ble Uttarakhand High Court set aside the reversion order and directed to reinstate the petitioner on the post of Junior Clerk on which post he has been working at the time of reversion and the liberty was given to the respondents to pass a fresh order if the circumstances so requires after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The said order of the Hon'ble Court was passed on the ground that the petitioner had not been given an opportunity of hearing before passing the impugned order dated 30.10.1997. The writ petition was allowed on 7.7.2005 by the Hon'ble Uttarakhand High Court. The petitioner was given joining as Junior Clerk under the C.M.O., Champawat. Again the petitioner was given a show cause notice by the respondents and the petitioner submitted his reply to the show cause notice to the respondents within the stipulated period. The petitioner was again reverted back to the Class IV post of Lab Assistant by the impugned order. The petitioner has further alleged in his petition that the father of the petitioner died on 12.11.1977 during his services and the petitioner was entitled for appointment on the Class III post as per his qualification but the petitioner was appointed on the Class IV post as Lab Assistant not in accordance with Dying in Harness Rules, likewise other daily wagers, who were working since 1976 with him. The petitioner was neither given benefit under Dying in Harness Rules nor he was given compassionate appointment. The petitioner was entitled for the Class III post on the compassionate ground as per his qualification. The petitioner made a representation on 25.11.1977 requesting to the Joint Director, Medical Health Department, Patwadangar, Nainital to give him appointment under the Dying in Harness Rules in place of his father according to his qualification to meet the distress of the family of the deceased father. The petitioner was making representation since long after the appointment as Lab Assistant. Ultimately, the Joint Director made his appointment and promotion in the year 1987 as Junior Clerk. The petitioner has fur
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.