SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(UK) 589

ALOK SINGH, SERVESH KUMAR GUPTA
Ajay Bhatt – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Alok Singh, J.

Since in the present special appeal as well as in the writ petition, identical questions of fact and law are involved, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, special appeal and writ petition were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Present appeal is filed assailing the judgment and order dated 9.7.2013 passed by the learned single Judge of this Court, whereby writ petition No. 1066 of 2013 (M/S) was dismissed.

3. Writ Petition No. 1066 of 2013 (M/S) was filed before the learned single Judge of this Court assailing Ordinance No. 01 of 2013 known as The Uttarakhand State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) (Amendment) Ordinance, 2013 notified vide notification No. 178/XXXVI (3)/2013/36 (2)/2006 dated 13.4.2013, and further seeking a mandamus declaring respondent No. 4, namely, Dr. Harak Singh Rawat, to be disqualified for being member of Uttarakhand Legislative Assembly in view of Article 191 of the Constitution of India.

4. During the pendency of the present appeal, the Uttarakhand State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualification) (Amendment) Act, 2013 (Uttarakhand Act No. 32 of



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top