SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(UK) 583

SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Govind Singh Rautela – Appellant
Versus
U. P. Financial Corporation – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner before this Court has challenged the recovery proceedings initiated against him by respondent No.1 U.P. Financial Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'Corporation'). The main contention of the petitioner is that the recovery is barred by time.

2. The petitioner not only denies that he has any dues against the Corporation, but also challenges the recovery proceedings on the grounds that the same is time barred. Admittedly the petitioner had taken a loan from the Corporation in the year 1981. The total loan sanctioned a term loan of Rs. 24,000/- for establishing of a Confectionery Unit, however, the total loan which was given to him was only Rs. 20,000/-.

3. According to the petitioner he regularly paid installments to the Corporation. He received a letter from the Corporation on 02.08.2009 in which the Corporation demanded a sum of Rs. 13,850/- as principal amount and Rs. 51,151/- as interest thereon i.e. total sum of Rs. 71,001/- as outstanding against the petitioner.

4. This said amount was not paid by the petitioner and subsequently, a recovery proceedings have been initiated against the petitioner under the U.P. Public Money (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1972 (in
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top