SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(UK) 154

SUDHANSHU DHULIA
BHUWAN CHANDRA PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.K. Joshi, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. R.P. Sharma, Learned Brief Holder

JUDGMENT :

Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner applied for the post of Assistant Teacher (Primary School) in a Government School. The essential qualifications for appointment on the post of Assistant Teacher (Primary School) are that one should be a graduate with B.T.C or B.Ed. and should have qualified an examination known as “Teachers Eligibility Test” (from hereinafter referred to as “TET”). The petitioner has all the qualifications and consequently he applied for the post of Assistant Teacher (Primary School). He has applied as a dependent of a “freedom fighter”. His candidature has been rejected as the petitioner has been informed that his candidature has been rejected as he has crossed the upper age limit of 40 years.

2. Admittedly a candidate must not have reached the age of 40 years as on 01.07.2013. It is again admitted that when the petitioner applied for the post in question, his age was 44 years 09 months and 20 days, in other words, he had not completed 45 years of age, though he had crossed 40 years of age. He then relies upon a Government Order dated 21.05.2005 (Annexure No.5 to the writ petition), by which, inter alia, for the dependants of fre








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top