K.M.JOSEPH, V.K.BIST
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND STATE INFORMATION COMMISSION – Respondent
Hon’ble K.M. Joseph, C.J. (Oral)
Appellant is the writ petitioner and is State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission of Uttarakhand (hereinafter referred to as the writ petitioner). The writ petition was filed by the writ petitioner seeking the following relief:
“a) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 01.12.2009 passed in Appeal No. A-1778/2009; Smt. Harshita Vs. Public Information Officer and another (ANNEXURE – XII to the writ petition).”
2. The order passed by the appellant was sought by the third respondent in the translated version, i.e. though the order was pronounced in English, the third respondent wanted the said order to be translated into Hindi version in Devanagari script. An Application was moved by the third respondent under Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) with a request to supply the copy of the order in Hindi, as, according to the third respondent, she was not well versed with English language. This was not complied with and the Appeal filed before the Appellate Authority was unsuccessful. It is thereupon that she filed a further appeal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.