SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(UK) 299

ALOK SINGH
MOHAN SINGH RANA – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRA SHEKHAR TIWARI – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Hon’ble Alok Singh, J. (Oral)

Present petition is preferred assailing the order dated 21.07.2015 passed by the Appellate Court in Rent Control Appeal No. 17 of 2012, whereby amendment sought by the tenant/appellant in the written statement was declined.

2. Brief facts of the present case, inter alia, are that landlord/respondents, herein, have filed one petition under Section 21 (1) (a) of the U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 (in short, Rent Act), seeking eviction of the tenant/petitioner, herein, from the shop in question on the ground that landlord/respondent no.1, herein, is a Law graduate, therefore, needs shop in question to establish and run his Law Office therein. It is further stated in the petition under Section 21 (1) (a) of the Rent Act that landlord has no other suitable alternate place to establish and run his Law Office, therefore, shop in question is bonafidely, genuinely and urgently required by the landlord/respondents, for their personal use. In the first paragraph of the petition under Section 21 (1) (a) of the Rent Act, landlord/respondents, herein, have given details/boundaries of the shop in question specifically mentioning therein that towards South of th























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top