SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Annu Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
1. The present applicant is presently facing a trial under Sections 302/354 of IPC and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, which is presently under way before the Fast Track Court/Special Judge, POCSO/Additional District Judge, Dehradun. The charge against the present applicant is that he had molested the eleven years old girl and thereafter burnt her alive. The charge-sheet has been filed against the present applicant.
2. Earlier on 01.07.2014, applicant filed an application for conducting a Narco Analysis Test on him, this application of the applicant was rejected by the trial court on 17.07.2014 by a detailed order.
3. As of now, all the prosecution witnesses have been examined. Thereafter, the applicant has also cross-examined defence witness i.e., PW-1 Smt. Lakshmi who is the mother of the present applicant/accused. The applicant was also examined under Section 313 CrPC. At such a belated stage, an application was moved by the applicant before the court below on 16.11.2015 stating that a Narco Analysis Test be conducted on him for which he had volunteered earlier. This application has also been rejected by the court bel
Smt. Selvi & others Vs. State of Karnataka reported in AIR 2010 SC 1974
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.