SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(UK) 186

SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Sachin Chamoli – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.

1. Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.

2. Mr. S.S. Adhikari, Brief Holder for the State/respondents.

3. The present applicant before this Court has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 CrPC and filed the present application.

4. The case of the applicant before this Court is that one Ankur Sinha has committed an offence under Sections 420/468 of IPC and Sections 10/24 of the Emigration Act. The applicant filed an application to this effect before the Police Station Dalanwala, Dehradun wherein no action was taken. Thereafter, he moved an application to Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun but nothing happened and ultimately he had to invoke the jurisdiction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun by filing an application under Section 156(3) CrPC praying that a direction be given to the police authority to do the needful in the matter which was rejected by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun vide order dated 15.02.2016 which is annexed as Annexure No.2 to the present application.

5. Both the applications which have been filed before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Dehradun and learned Chief




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top