SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Krishan Kant Anand – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
1. The revisionist before this Court was an Engineer in the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation (from hereinafter referred to as “THDC”). He had some problems with the management of the THDC, regarding his service. On 08.04.2009 between 4.00-4.30 in the evening, when he was on his way to the office of the General Manager, his car was stopped at the office gate by a Guard of the Central Industrial Security Force, who was on duty. According to the revisionist he was then taken out from his car and repeatedly assaulted by the said Guard. Thereafter the revisionist tried to lodge the first information report before the police but it was only lodged as a non cognizable report. Aggrieved, the revisionist moved a complaint before the learned Magistrate which was dismissed by the learned Magistrate. Against the said order, the revisionist preferred a revision before the revisional court, which was allowed by the revisional court and it was directed to the learned Magistrate to decide the complaint as per the law. Consequently, the learned Magistrate passed an order directing the police authorities to lodge an FIR, investigate the matter and do the needful. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.