SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(UK) 405

ALOK SINGH
Ranjeet Singh @ Hajura Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jagminder Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. M.S. Tyagi, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Alok Singh, J.

1. For the reasons stated in the application, supplementary affidavit is taken on record.

2. IA No. 3369 of 2015 stands disposed of accordingly.

3. Present petition is filed assailing the judgment and order dated 19.06.2015, passed by Board of Revenue, Uttarakhand whereby application moved by the petitioner for correction of the revenue entries under Sections 33/39 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act was rejected.

4. Brief facts of the present case, inter alia, are that petitioner has moved one application under Section 33/34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act saying that existing khasra No. 2207 (old number 1078M) was never bequeathed in favour of Jagminder Singh nor his name was directed to be mutated over the land of old khasra No. 1078 M; however, near about 2004, name of Jagminder Singh, respondent, herein was entered over the land of khasra No. 2207 (old No. 1078M), therefore, his name should be deleted from the revenue record over the khasra No. 2207 and name of the petitioner should be recorded in the revenue record over the land of khasra No. 2207; application for correction so moved by the petitioner was allowed by the Assistant Collector, 1st Class, Rishikesh, vi




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top