K.M. Joseph, J.

Appellant is the writ petitioner. He filed the writ petition seeking to quash order dated 01.03.2011 passed by the Grievance Redressal Cell, Tehri Dam Project (hereinafter referred to as ‘respondent no. 2’), whereby the claim of the petitioner for compensation, in accordance with his entitlement as per the Rehabilitation Policy was allegedly rejected. A direction was sought to the respondent-authorities to grant all permissible rehabilitation benefits to the appellant.

2. Very briefly put, the case of the appellant before the learned Single Judge was as follows:

Appellant is a permanent resident of village Kumrada in District Uttarkashi. The grandfather of the appellant was one Chota; he had four sons, namely, Khantu, Gobru, Sundar Singh and Bharat Singh. Appellant is the son of Gobru; Sunder Singh had two sons, namely, Dheer Singh and Prem Singh. Bharat Singh had two grand sons, namely, Pratap Singh and Asad Singh. We think it sufficient to refer to the family tree as above, as it is sufficient to resolve the controversy, which is raised before us. The further allegations are that the predecessor in interest of the appellant was recorded as bhumidhar with tr