SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(UK) 293

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.
Gurmeet Singh @ Gurjeet Singh & others - Applicants
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand & another - Respondents
Criminal Misc. Application No. 812 of 2016
Decided On : 14-07-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants : Mr. Girish Chandra Lakhchaura
For the State : Mr. Hari Om Bhakuni, Ms. Sangeeta Bhardwaj

The court emphasized the importance of appearing before the trial court and moving an application for bail, which would be considered on the same day due to the bailable nature of the offence.

Headnote:

Excise Act - First Information Report - The court declined to interfere with the proceedings and directed the applicants to appear before the trial court to face the trial, emphasizing that if the applicants move an application for bail before the trial court, it shall be considered on the same day due to the bailable nature of the offence.

Fact of the Case:

A First Information Report was lodged against the applicants under Section 60(2) of the Excise Act. The police filed a charge sheet, and the case was registered and pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Finding of the Court:

The court declined to interfere with the proceedings and directed the applicants to appear before the trial court to face the trial.

Issues: The court considered the evidence and the provision of Section 60(2) of the Excise Act, raised by the applicants' counsel, regarding the imprisonment and fine for the offence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that there was no ground to interfere with the proceedings and emphasized that the applicants should appear before the trial court and move an application for bail, which would be considered on the same day due to the bailable nature of the offence.

Final Decision: The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed.

JUDGMENT :

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.

1. In this case, a First Information Report has been lodged by respondent No. 2 – Shyam Lal Vishwakarma, who is Sub-Inspector at Police Station Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, under Section 60(2) of the Excise Act at Police Station Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar against the present applicants. Subsequently, the police after investigations has filed its charge sheet on 02.07.2015, before the court concerned and a case was registered being Criminal Case No. 3270 of 2015, which is pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, under the aforesaid section against the applicants. Consequently, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance in the matter and summons have been issued against the applicants. Hence, the applicant has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by filing the present application.

2. Heard Mr. Girish Chandra Lakhchaura, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Hari Om Bhakuni, learned A.G.A. with Ms. Sangeeta Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand, and perused the records.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the court below has not considered the evidence, produced before it properly and took cognizance in the matter against the present applicant. Learned counsel for the applicants has relied upon the provision of Section 60(1) of the Uttarakhand/U.P. (Amendment) Excise Act, which clearly stipulates an imprisonment less than six months, which may extend upto three years and with fine of rupees five thousand, which may extend upto ten thousand. Section 60(2) of the Uttarakhand/U.P. (Amendment) Excise Act reads as under:-

“60 Penalty for unlawful import, export, transport, manufacture, possession, sale, etc.

(1) Whoever, in contravention of this Act or of any rule or order made thereunder, or of any licence, permit or pass obtained thereunder –

(a) Import, export, transport or possesses any intoxicant other then charas; or

(b) cultivates any hemp plant (Cannabis sativa); or

(c) collects or sells any portion of the hemp plant (Cannabis sativa) from which any intoxicating drug can be manufactured; or

(d) constructs or works any distillery, brewery or vintnery; or

(e) uses, keeps or has possession any material, still utensil implement or apparatus, whatsoever, for the purpose of manufacturing any intoxicant other that tari; or

(f) removes any intoxicant from any distillery, brewery, vintnery or warehouse licensed, established or continued under this Act; or

(g) bottles any liquor for the purposes of sale; or

(h) sells any intoxicant, save in the case provided for by section 61; or

(i) taps or intoxicant, save in the tari producing tree in the areas notified under Section 42;

shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to two years and with fine which shall, in the case of an offence under clause (i) not be less than ten times the amount of duty which would have been leviable if such intoxicant had been dealt with in accordance with this Act and the rules and orders made thereunder or in accordance with any licence, permit or pass obtained thereunder, and in any other case, not be less than ten times the amount of such duty, or five thousand rupees, whichever is greater.

(2) ………….

(3) ……….. ”

4. Considering the above provision of law as well as documents available on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter as far as the proceedings are concerned. The proceedings shall go on before the court below, in accordance with law. The applicants shall appear before the court concerned to face the trial. However, it is made clear, in case, the applicants appear before the trial court and move application for their bail before the learned Magistrate concerned, the same shall be considered as far as possible on the same day itself considering the above provision in mind as well as the fact that the offence is bailable.

5. Accordingly, the application under


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top