IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Rajiv Sharma, Alok Singh, JJ.
Ravindra Jugran – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India & others – Respondents
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 167 of 2015
Decided On : 07-11-2016
Delay - Public Infrastructure - The court directed the completion of delayed flyovers and provision of basic amenities, held government officials personally liable, and ordered inquiries for delays and incomplete bridges.
Fact of the Case:
The completion of flyovers at ISBT and Ballupur in Dehradun was delayed, and the completed flyover at GMS Road lacked basic amenities.
Finding of the Court:
The court directed Engineering Projects India Ltd. (EPIL) to complete the flyovers within six months, provide basic amenities, and held officials personally liable. It also ordered inquiries for delays and completion of incomplete bridges.
Issues: Delay in completion of public infrastructure, lack of basic amenities, and appointment of officials under relevant Acts.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of completing public infrastructure projects in a time-bound manner, providing basic amenities, and appointing suitable officials under relevant Acts.
Final Decision: The court directed EPIL to complete the flyovers and provide amenities within specified timelines, held officials personally liable, ordered inquiries, and directed the appointment of suitable officials. The petition was disposed of with a warning of contempt proceedings for non-compliance.
Rajiv Sharma, J.
1. The question of great public importance has been raised in this petition. Startling revelation has been made in this petition that the flyovers at ISBT and Ballupur situate at Dehradun, have not been completed till date. The completion of Ballupur flyover was to be done by 30.11.2015 and ISBT flyover was also to be done in the year 2015.
2. The Court can take judicial notice of the fact that the Government Projects are delayed, causing uncalled for loss of public revenue.
3. The construction of flyovers at ISBT and Ballupur, Dehradun has been assigned to Engineering Projects India Ltd. (EPIL). It is a Govt. Undertaking. The Public Works Department is the nodal agency.
4. Accordingly, in the larger public interest, EPIL is directed to complete the flyovers at ISBT, Dehradun and Ballupur, Dehradun within a period of six months from today positively.
5. The Managing Director (EPIL) and Secretary (PWD) of the State of Uttarakhand shall be personally liable for the construction of the flyovers within the stipulated period of six months.
6. The petitioner has also brought to the notice of this Court that though the flyovers at General Mahadev Singh Road (GMS), Balliwala, Dehradun has been completed, but it lacks the basic amenities, as per the National Highway Act 1956.
7. Accordingly, there shall be direction to the EPIL to provide necessary basic amenities i.e. lighting, service road, drainage and pedestrian path, as visualized under the law within a period of three months from today.
8. The Managing Director of EPIL along with Secretary (PWD) of the State of Uttarakhand shall be personally liable to provide the infrastructure at GMS Road, Dehradun flyover.
9. The Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways is directed to hold inquiry for the delay in execution of flyovers at ISBT, Dehradun and Ballupur, Dehradun within six months from today. The Secretary, Road Transport and Highways shall fix the personal responsibility of each and every officer/officials who is/are responsible for delay of construction of the flyovers at ISBT, Dehradun and Ballupur, Dehradun, causing loss of public revenue and inconvenience to the general public.
10. The Court has taken judicial notice of the fact that throughout the State of Uttarakhand, there are number of incomplete bridges, for the reasons best known to the Authorities concerned. These are also required to be completed in a time-bound manner.
11. There shall be direction to the Secretary PWD of the State of Uttarakhand to ensure that all the incomplete bridges are completed within a period of one year from today.
12. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Executive Engineer (PWD) has been appointed as Highway Administration under Section 3 of the Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002. It is absolutely erroneous. An officer of suitable rank not below the rank of Chief Engineer ought to have been appointed as Highway Administration to exercise powers and discharge functions conferred under the Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002. The duties to be discharged by the Highway Administration are to prevent the unauthorized occupations of Highway land and their removal and also to control access to the National Highways. The duties to be discharged by the Highway Administration are of utmost public importance.
13. The National Highways are the lifelines of the citizens and it is the duty of the officer/officials appointed under the said Act to maintain them in proper condition and to ensure that there is no unauthorized occupations and encroachment of National Highways and the access to Highways is also controlled, as per law.
14. Accordingly, there shall be direction to the Central Govt. to notify any Chief Engineer of PWD in the State of Uttarakhand to be the Highways Administration to exercise his powers and its functions under the said Act within a period of three weeks from today by revoking the earlier notific
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.