U.C.DHYANI
Mohammad Imran – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent
U.C. Dhyani, J.
By means of present writ petition, the petitioners pray for the following reliefs, among others:
“Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR No. 264 of 2016 dated 19.09.2016 under Sections 363 and 506 of IPC, PS Kotwali Kiccha, District Udham Singh Nagar lodged by the respondent no.3 and also be pleased to stay the arrest of the petitioners during the pendency of this Writ Petition before this Hon’ble Court, failing which the petitioners will suffer irreparable loss and injury (Annexure No.1).”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State, perused the documents brought on record and considered the grounds taken up in the writ petition.
3. Mohd. Saeem and another had filed criminal writ petition no. 1292 of 2016 before this Court on the ground that they have married to each other. The married couple was present in the Court on 22.09.2016. After considering the grounds taken up in the writ petition and having perused the documents brought on record, this Court decided the said writ petition on 22.09.2016.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that present petitioners are parents
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.